Showing posts with label Commentary. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Commentary. Show all posts

Monday, 16 July 2012

Taren916 The Ugly Truth About YouTube & Business.




The video I agree with is below. MelsharyA pretty much summed up my view on Taren's video. I agreed with Taren, just not entirely.

If you believe your blog/vlog is worth something, then set the standards. Demand the commission etc. Remember, the companies can go elsewhere to get their products reviewed for free. There are many people on YouTube and in the internet world with more or similar influence power and some would probably do these reviews for free.

Don't knock a company for not offering commission! To me the product itself is a reward. I've never made a YouTube video before so I don't know the amount of time and energy that goes into making videos. What I do know though is that writing blog posts can be quite time consuming for me because I attempt to get all my facts accurate and I strive to make my writing as coherent as possible.

If you believe you're worth something, demand it. I do not knock YouTuber's hustle at all! Review the products and get the money! But don't blame companies like it is their responsibility to offer commission. Draw up an agreement with them, the responsibility lies with the blogger/vlogger and the company.

Sunday, 15 July 2012

Yes! Lucy Liu to star as Dr Watson in Sherlock Holmes

Lucy Liu will play Dr Joan Watson in a new adaptation of Sherlock Holmes known as Elementary.

I personally loved Lucy Liu in Kill Bill. I mean who didn't?

Pics from Tumblr:

  
 

Looking fabulous! I've always thought she was really beautiful. Her freckles make her look unique.

Congrats to her playing the female Dr Watson but also for being the first woman of another race to play this role!

But this hasn't come without its complaints though. To some people it's a problem that she's a female... but to others it's also because she's Asian. 

Dr John Watson is a friend, assistant and roommate of Sherlock Holmes. I suppose it's 'bromance'. I gathered that people like the fact that (traditionally) Holmes and Watson are both males and are able to be friends without sexual tension or anything like that (which I suspect may occur in Elementary because Dr Watson is now a female...). In this case I could completely understand why people would be uncomfortable with Liu playing Dr Watson.

However, this series is a modern adaptation. It's loosely based on the original story. Elements of the series have been changed to make it more relevant to the 21st century. There have been many different originals of Sherlock Holmes, as well as many different adaptations. If you don't like this particular one, you can still watch the other ones!

I believe that Liu can successfully execute her role as Dr Watson. She's always played sexy, tenacious characters... the good guys or the bad guys. She's played in Charlie's Angels so there is no doubt that she can play the role of a good guy.

I know there will be some awkward moments between her and Holmes (as expected) but Dr Watson and Mr Holmes will remain professional!

About Joan Watson being Asian..

I'm under the impression that white America is sometimes not ready for people of colour playing particular movie roles. I've already discussed this in this post. Racism in fandom is nothing new so I won't go over that. It shouldn't be an issue that an Asian is playing Joan Watson. It's a modern adaptation after all. 

I believe that Hollywood needs to become more diverse and remain that way. Hollywood needs to reflect the diversity of the U.S. and the Western world in general. I'm not insinuating that Hollywood isn't diverse, but they could make some improvements when it comes to bigger movie/television roles. 

There were other instances where people of other races should have been portrayed rather than white people (this is my personal opinion). There is nothing wrong with white people getting big movie roles, I just wish though that people of other races would be given the chance as well.

Archaeologists have discovered that Cleopatra's mother is African. This makes Cleopatra of mixed-ancestry. Despite this, Angelina Jolie is portraying Cleopatra in the new Cleopatra movie. 


Angelina Jolie as Cleopatra


Elizabeth Taylor portrayed Cleopatra in 1963.


http://www.mrdowling.com/images/702cleopatra.jpg
Elizabeth Taylor as Cleopatra in 1963
Both women are unequivocally beautiful, but the roles are clearly not for them (physical appearance-wise). 

In another movie, a Scandinavian biracial actress, Jacqueline Fleming, portrayed Harriet Tubman in Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter.   


Jaqueline Fleming

Harriet Tubman

Uploaded on Jaqueline Fleming's Twitter.




Hmmm.

Of course it's impossible to get an actress/actor to portray someone to the tee but I was hoping for a more realistic portrayal. The directors must have thought 'let them be black but not too black'. This is all too real and it's nothing new.

There are more instances:
I know, I know... the creators aren't Asian but I was hoping that they'd cast someone East Asian in one of the main roles. They've allowed Dev Patel to play Zuko. I think that's fine, but what about the other characters?

Cast of The Last Airbender

This one takes the cake (I've always thought of Goku as Japanese...)

Dragonball Evolution

Goku from Dragonball Z

Anime characters tend to be drawn racially ambiguous, but that shouldn't be a reason to portray almost everyone in a movie as white. I suppose the director/producer of Dragonball Evolution covered their back by casting some Asian women in the movie.

Don't give me that 'they want to portray actors/actresses that we know', I have never heard of Justin Chatwin (Goku in Dragonball Evolution) before. I doubt he's still (if he ever was) relevant.

Back to Elementary... I will watch it (as long as I don't get too caught up in school work). I'm excited to see how this will play out. It really shouldn't be too different from the original Sherlock Holmes series but I think an element of interest has been added by having a Dr Joan Watson, rather than a Dr John Watson. Here is the trailer:


Will you tune into Elementary?

Tuesday, 3 July 2012

Disgraceful; Fabricating or Plagiarising Writing.

If something irked me this week, it's probably this story;

Intern Fired from Wall Street Journal for Creating Fake Sources and Quotes



Source: Liane Membis.

An intern who probably worked hard enough to get that place with the Wall Street Journal is faking sources and quotes? You don't even have a career yet and you're already being dishonest?! 

Too lazy to find a source? Too arrogant to think that you could get away with fabrication? 

Why not create sources by interviewing individuals connected to the story? She could have easily gone to the streets to interview people. I am confident that people would have answered her questions, especially if it was going to be posted in a paper! 

If you couldn't find any source, why couldn't you just say 'I can't find any'? Telling the truth is much better than lying. I doubt they'd think you're incompetent if you couldn't find a source. 

For someone who has gone to Yale (and I'm not insinuating that those who attend type of schools are morally rich or bankrupt or anything), you'd think that they would understand the importance of truthfulness and referencing the correct sources. At university they tell you over and over again the importance of referencing correctly and using the correct sources. I'm starting to question if she did this during her education at Yale too. 

Liane appears to have a thorough experience when it comes to extracurriculars, education and work and she's interning for a respectable online newspaper, yet throws that all away because she couldn't say;

''I can't find any sources''.

She has completely disregarded what the WSJ stands for. WSJ have taken the appropriate action by removing the article in question and by firing her. 

Who is going to take her on as an intern now? A simple Google search of her name would bring up this disgraceful story. 

There are plenty of aspiring writers who would have loved to have the chance to intern for the WSJ and who would have taken pride in their work and ensure that it is of great quality. 

Your writing reflects on you as a person. Your writing also reflects on the organisation you're working for. If you can't be passionate enough to at least admit that you can't write certain things or to attempt getting the sources you require, I'm thinking a career in writing is probably not for you. 

I'm not a writer, I'm a mere blogger sharing my life experiences and the like, but even I understand the importance of quoting the correct sources and not fabricating sources or making up stories. 

But that is not all. According to a post by Dave Lucas, Liane has been plagiarising from other websites. She's since then taken down her personal and blogging websites, Facebook and Twitter. 

Pressures to meet deadlines probably got the best of Liane when it came to her article for WSJ. I don't think plagiarising images from another website is justifiable. I would have loved to have read her reasons for doing what she did but it appears that she doesn't want to do that... or at least not yet. Her response (or lack of it) tells me that she's embarrassed and possibly ashamed of what she did, I don't blame her for that. I wish her the best. 




Thursday, 7 June 2012

Are we going too far when it comes to other people's natural hair?

A couple of nights ago I was scrolling through Curly Nikki to look at some articles that I may have missed from the last time I looked. 

I came across an article about Solange Knowles and her natural hair.

Here are some natural hair styles Solange has been sporting;


https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiCubK_Fo8FOpIRcGYqRGaGeOtbblIXifLE4bZTMg5BEr2urUq1COCqjtOmW8etNW9IpTKla5imA48Ss159hgQ6uUMbCfufaTyryZMuDsN-jdHJnLp_3aOEAOrB-GNzTmGCNxFOHbA8gMts/s1600/Solance+Natural+Hair.jpg





http://static1.purepeople.com/articles/9/76/99/9/@/588512-solange-knowles-lors-de-la-soiree-de-637x0-2.jpg




http://charcoalink.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/solange-hot-natural-hair-ii.jpg


Solange is also known to switch up her hairstyles and wear curly protective styles; 

http://lushcoils.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/solange-knowles-look-of-the-day-2.jpg


Her reason;

''Well, I'm in all these different places and working with different hairstylists, so it's important for me to wear it in a protective style''.

Thumbs up to her for protecting her own hair. I love her curly protective styles; they are unapologetically big and very curly!

While I like her protective styles, I love her afro's too! They're nicely shaped and really suit her. Ever since Solange went back to her natural roots, she's also become more open when it comes to her fashion style.

Back to the Curly Nikki blogpost... the comments there are sort of yay or nay responses. I have to admit though that some of them were unsettling to me. There were also comments that were quite positive. Anyhow, the comments made me think a lot about how some people may view other people's natural hair and also what it means to be natural.

Some of the negative comments regarding Solange's hair;
  • It's not unique
  • Biggest thing that has happened since her career
  • Looks unkempt and requires combing
  • Looks dry and un-styled (she needs to use twistouts/braidouts to style her hair)
  • Her 4c hair type does not look the same as other 4c naturals hair type.
There were also some positive comments about Solange;
  • She dealt with the criticisms and stuck with being natural
  • I love her hair and style
  • It's her preference
  • She looks stunning no matter what she wears
The beauty (and the ugly) of the internet is that we can express ourselves and our opinion to a wider audience. 

Honesty is a good thing (depending on the context I suppose...). It's not necessarily 'hating'. People can be honest and make constructive criticisms. But if criticism is made with the intent to be malicious it can be classed as 'hating'.

A lot of the comments which had some negativity came with with the commenter stating that they were 'being honest' and 'didn't want to sugar-coat' their views on natural hair.

I think that's a wonderful thing but erm... do some of us go too far when we start dictating;

  • How naturals should wear and style their hair?
  • How naturals should protect their hair?
  • What products naturals should use on their hair (i.e. no silicone, petroleum based products)?*
  • What makes you natural and what makes you not natural (i.e. using dye makes you not natural, relaxing your edges makes you not natural etc.)?*
*By the way, those are not my views, I'm just stating some examples that I've encountered. 

About Solange's hair type;
If you're not so sure about hair typing, click on this link. Some of the comments claimed that Solange's hair is type 4c and that it doesn't look like other naturals' 4c hair.

Based on photos, it can be difficult to see what hair type someone may have. Manipulating hair and product on the hair can also distort hair types. In order for anyone to be able to judge someone's hair type, their hair has to be product free, not manipulated and dry.

I personally believe that our hair cannot be typed into four different categories because it's just that diverse. Most people also have multiple hair types on their head.



The image accompanied with the Curly Nikki post


Not sure if the commenter looked at this picture and decided that her 4c hair is not the same as other naturals with 4c hair, but her hair looks manipulated in this picture so it can be hard to judge.

But seriously, do we need to know other people's hair type? I suppose it can be useful for someone who may want to attempt the same products as her or the same styles. But other factors such as hair porosity and hair density can be just as important as hair type.


About her styles 
If you actually read the interview, Solange states very clearly what she likes her hair to be like;

''I actually love my natural hair when it's in a twist out and it's been slept on for five days and revived by the steam of the shower''. 

There it is, she's stated what she likes. She likes, what is in effect, a stretched out fro. She's not concerned with pin and curls, defined twist outs etc. She just wants natural hair in a twist out that's been slept on for days and has been revived by the steam of the shower.

She is allowed to wear her hair the way she wants to (surely she is?!).

About her hair looking dry... Afro-textured hair can appear dry. Even when you've conditioned and sealed it, it can still appear dry. Our hair doesn't give that shine. Specific products and techniques can help with that.

It could be that Solange used products on her hair or just water or nothing at all. Again, is that really our concern?

About Solange in general? 

Solange has a successful career. She sings, films, models, takes part in entrepreneurship. These criticisms regarding her hair are likely not to be some of the worst she has encountered during her career.

Solange is not a natural hair spokesperson and she's kind of hinted that here;

ESSENCE: Are you surprised so many people are inspired by you?SOLANGE KNOWLES: I am! I wasn't expecting that. 

I don't even think she was aiming to inspire people by going natural or sporting the cool hair styles that she does. I think she just wanted to do what she felt was best for her.

Solange may be involved with Carol's Daughter etc, but I assume that's to solely endorse their products.

I personally like Solange for going against the norm, especially because she's in the entertainment industry. She's in the spotlight. Everyone can see her. She has to deal with the criticisms, but she'll also hear praises. What she's doing is a tough thing (but it comes with fame, doesn't it?)!

Solange does not have the same hair as other 'natural hair idols' such as Corinne Bailey Rae, Esperanza Spalding or Tracee Ellis Ross. She is really holding her own. Those ladies are doing well too actually, sporting their own hair and being confident with it.

As for Solange trying to draw attention because she's in her sister's shadow... really? She's always expressed that she and her sister are artistically different and she seems to enjoy her own endeavours.

What else?

I'm just going to say it straight. I believe there is a bias in the natural hair community when it comes to certain hair types and hair lengths. I believe there is a hierarchy. Those with bigger and/or longer hair seem to get a lot of praise for it. I guess because it's not seen as often? I guess it's because people aspire to obtain that for themselves?

If Solange's hair would have been longer, would she have had more oohing and awing? Tracee Elis Ross, Esperanza Spalding and Corinne Bailey Rae tend to be regarded as natural hair icons, is it because they have long hair and/or curly hair? Why are not more tightly coiled naturals regarded as hair idols? Are there any tightly coiled naturals regarded as natural hair idols in the spotlight (I know a few which aren't but I do consider them as my own personal natural hair idol)?

One comment (I didn't exactly copy or quote this) goes a bit like this;

People have left the bone straight mindset but now they are in the defined curls mind set.

That's what it really feels like if I'm honest. A lot of naturals are looking for 'the thing' to define their hair. Whether it be hair butters, hair gels or other defining products (even techniques), a lot of naturals want to 'pop' their curls or have defined styles.

I like Solange. It's no secret, I like some of her songs, some of her styles etc. I don't feel obligated to comment negatively if I don't like some of the things she does. It's really up to her.

People should be able to express their opinions, it is their right. Being truthful is good. We don't have to lie, just to appear polite. But do we need to state everything that is wrong in our eyes regarding someone else's hair? If you haven't been asked for an opinion, sometimes you don't need to give it!

This post has made me think so much about the natural hair community. I'd dread to get the same sort of reaction from other naturals. I think some can be too harsh (even though they're just being honest). Some things are better left unsaid. If someone is visibly struggling with their hair it is nice to just be honest and advice them of the steps they need to take to improve it.

Being a natural in a straight haired world can be difficult for some people. We need to learn to embrace people's differences and abilities to make their own choices.

So do you think some naturals go too far when it comes to other people's natural hair? Yes or no? And why?

Sunday, 12 June 2011

Natural Hair Movement Gains Followers...

... Among Afro- American Women.

The article that lead to the Independent.co.uk writing this article was this one. 

A couple of problems with the Independent article, in my opinion, is that it completely ignores the natural hair 'movement', within the UK. It either ignores that, or is ignorant of the fact that it does exist. 

We have had natural hair meet up and events, but currently also British naturals on YouTube and on blogs as well.

When we will get the same recognition as our sisters across the Atlantic, I do not know. But it would have been nice if they looked into this closer to home.